{"id":109356,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/109356/?format=json","text_counter":310,"type":"speech","speaker_name":"Mr. Orengo","speaker_title":"The Minister for Lands","speaker":{"id":129,"legal_name":"Aggrey James Orengo","slug":"james-orengo"},"content":" Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, if you look at the current Constitution, you will find that the word, “Disciplined Force” is defined. If you look at the earlier version that was brought by Mr. Musila, you will also find that it actually defined what a Disciplined Force is. Although I agree with Mr. Mutula Kilonzo that legal interpretation can be stretched to include the other forces as it were, I think to leave it out in the Constitution without a definition when we know that in the current Constitution there is a definition of what the Disciplined Forces are--- If you look at the Armed Forces Act, you will find that the Disciplined Forces are defined. Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I just want to be a little helpful if this may help us move forward by moving an amendment that I think will enhance the Motion. I also think that the two Motions by Mr. Musila and by Maj-Gen. Nkaissery are a little bit different. I beg to move that the Motion be amended as follows:- THAT, the Motion be amended by inserting a new paragraph immediately after paragraph (a) as follows:- For purposes of Clause 5, uniformed services includes--- Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am using the word, “includes” so that the principal that Mr. Mutula Kilonzo prescribed earlier may apply."}