{"id":121668,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/121668/?format=json","text_counter":342,"type":"other","speaker_name":"","speaker_title":"","speaker":null,"content":"Under Section 4, on dominant position, on the interpretation of various undertakings coming together, I think it is important we define in a clearer manner, what a dominant position is. This is because when you are talking about competition, and when you want to restrict so that, that competition does not ensure that there is a monopolistic angle of a business venture; it is important that we are very clear on what the definition of a dominant position is. Although I know that in most parts of the Bill, there is always a clause that says: “A board of an authority should borrow money.” I did not understand the rationale under Section 7, on why this particular board would have powers to borrow money, because this is a board purely to determine and define whether there is competition or whether that competition is good. I did not understand why it required certain power to borrow money, because it is not in a position to trade or to even borrow money. It is a state funded corporation."}