{"id":128477,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/128477/?format=json","text_counter":317,"type":"other","speaker_name":"","speaker_title":"","speaker":null,"content":"(Prof. Saitoti): Mr. Speaker, Sir, as you can see, I am laughing very broadly today. I am a haughty man and I want to say that I am not in any way angry. When I get angry, I do really get angry. The point that I want to say is that all this has come about because of the reappointment of Justice Ringera and the contentious issue is whether the law was followed. I believe that is the position. But again, I believe the Constitution is also very clear. Namely, that indeed, if it is an issue of whether it is legal or illegal, Parliament in itself is not a court of law. The mechanism has already provided for in the Constitution which says that the interpretation will be done by a court of law. That is the only thing that I am saying. We cannot be the institution of Parliament here and at the same time"}