{"id":1420382,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1420382/?format=json","text_counter":435,"type":"speech","speaker_name":"Sen. M. Kajwang’","speaker_title":"","speaker":{"id":13162,"legal_name":"Moses Otieno Kajwang'","slug":"moses-otieno-kajwang"},"content":"Mr. Chairman, Sir, the Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) of this Bill, which I will keep referring to, is that we establish zones and define millers and growers within those zones. I think to argue against that essence is to argue against the Bill in its entirety. New Clauses 19A and B are providing a window for exemption circumstances. Clause 19B talks of inter-miller agreements, but it assumes that those agreements can only exist within a zone. Mr. Chairman, Sir, I believe that there will be a situation where you will have interzone, inter-miller agreements; millers in different zones. Therefore, I want to urge the Mover of this amendment, that in the same manner under Clause 19A, you provided for a procedure where a grower can send his cane outside the zone, let us also have a Clause 19B (2) that will address interzone miller agreements. The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Director, Hansard and AudioServices, Senate."}