{"id":152139,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/152139/?format=json","text_counter":397,"type":"speech","speaker_name":"Mr. Deputy Speaker","speaker_title":"","speaker":null,"content":"The Attorney-General is, indeed, moving the Bill. He does not have to have somebodyâs permission to move it. The point is, Standing Order No.81 states as follows:- âA Member who wishes to speak on any matter in which the Member has a personal interest shall first declare that interest.â The Standing Order does not make a distinction between talking on a Bill or moving a Bill or contributing to a Bill or speaking on a Private Membersâ Motion. It gives an impression of a blanket provision on any business that is on the Floor of the House, in which the Member has a personal interest. Now, whether remuneration for constitutional office holders is, indeed, a personal interest, or is outside the so-called âpersonal interestâ, is an issue we are basically looking at now. Mr. Attorney-General, in your own wisdom and judgement, and being literally the leading legal personality we have in here, you are in a position to understand this."}