{"id":489264,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/489264/?format=json","text_counter":846,"type":"speech","speaker_name":"Hon. Ng’ongo","speaker_title":"","speaker":{"id":110,"legal_name":"John Mbadi Ng'ong'o","slug":"john-mbadi"},"content":"Actually hon. Chepkong’a should have gone ahead to read the Constitution. The Constitution has not left it ambiguous on what is a Money Bill. It goes ahead to define it. Therefore, it is not just the discretion of the Speaker. But finally, this House has already considered this matter previously. There was a time I remember when we had a similar situation where an amendment had already been approved by the Speaker and, again, the Speaker did make a ruling that if it is discovered that this is a money Bill by nature, it is not admissible."}