{"id":514513,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/514513/?format=json","text_counter":202,"type":"speech","speaker_name":"Hon. Waiganjo","speaker_title":"","speaker":{"id":2644,"legal_name":"John Muriithi Waiganjo","slug":"john-muriithi-waiganjo"},"content":"Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, in my view, for most part, I agree with the Chairman on the amendments. In sub-clause 1, there is something called “reasonable suspicion.” When he substitutes that, it gives us a balance in law to say “reasonable suspicion” as against “has reason to believe.” In “c”, deletion of religious leaders: It is very difficult nowadays to know who a religious leader is. Until we define “religious leaders,” we cannot risk putting it here. In sub-clause 3, by inserting “to be concealed” in itself, it does not entirely dilute the substance of that Clause. I support the Chairman’s amendment in that respect."}