{"id":584021,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/584021/?format=json","text_counter":29,"type":"speech","speaker_name":"Sen. Murungi","speaker_title":"","speaker":{"id":93,"legal_name":"Kiraitu Murungi","slug":"kiraitu-murungi"},"content":"On a point of order, Madam Temporary Speaker. I would like to say the following on the comments made by my colleagues on my notice of Motion. If you look at the Notice of Motion, I read Article 188 which Sen. Khaniri is referring to because it says: “Noting the provisions of Article 188”. Article 188 talks about alteration of the boundaries while my notice of Motion does not talk about alteration of any boundary. According to me, the Districts and Provinces Act of 1992 had a Schedule which clearly states and gives geographical references of the districts per 1992. It is those districts which are now counties. Madam Temporary Speaker, we are not requesting for alteration of any boundary because they are clearly stated in the Districts and Provinces Act of 1992. My Motion is merely asking that those boundaries which are clearly stated in that Act be marked by placing beacons and, under the Standing Orders, Article 188 does not apply. The proposed Bill referred to has not come to the House. It is not before us and, therefore, the comments made by Sen. Murkomen are anticipatory. Therefore, he cannot refer to a Bill which is yet to be brought to the House to block my notice of Motion. Secondly, regarding my friend, the Senator for Makueni, his Motion is about the review of boundaries which will be almost similar to what Sen. Khaniri is talking about; review or alteration of boundaries. However, mine is strictly for marking of boundaries. There is a difference."}