{"id":591879,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/591879/?format=json","text_counter":391,"type":"speech","speaker_name":"Hon. Kajwang’","speaker_title":"","speaker":{"id":2712,"legal_name":"Tom Joseph Kajwang'","slug":"kajwang-tom-joseph-francis"},"content":"Let us have some sobriety in this. I accept and it is manifestly clear that this is a dangerous amendment in the way it is couched. But I think the Mover did not make it clear. When you have Ouko Investigation Committee and you send somebody to, for example, Kitale so that a witness can be summoned to be investigated before the House Committee, if you send the Serjeant-at-Arms or any of the officers, nobody will accept the summons. You will need a police officer seconded to the Parliamentary Service Commission (PSC) to serve those summons. Therefore, it is dangerous the way it is. But, can it be redrafted in such a way that gives these officers an opportunity to serve summons on anybody else that is connected with the investigations that the Committee is handling? I think that is where we are."}