{"id":658127,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/658127/?format=json","text_counter":295,"type":"speech","speaker_name":"Hon. Serut","speaker_title":"","speaker":{"id":297,"legal_name":"John Bomet Serut","slug":"john-serut"},"content":"Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. I want to specifically speak to Clause 22 (a) which seeks to delete sub-section (2) of Section 39 of the Land Registration Act and substitute with a new sub-section which says: “No certificate shall be required under subsection (1) if the instrument relates to a sublease where the lease is by virtue of any law subject to full payment of the rent by the head-lessor.” The certificate they are making reference to here is a certificate in terms of payment of rent by the head-lessor. This is the first registration. It has nothing to do with the certificate of title. It is a certificate issued by the land rates section. Deleting it means then that the head-lessor will not pay rent."}