{"id":695111,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/695111/?format=json","text_counter":1242,"type":"speech","speaker_name":"Mr. Charles Njenga","speaker_title":"","speaker":null,"content":"Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is good you have good intentions of me. One day, I will be a Senator but for now, I am just counsel for the County Assembly. I proceed to make our closing remarks. I will not go back to the grounds because in our closing submissions, we submit that all the grounds that are set out in the Motion and the charges before you have been well established. A factual basis has been laid. Evidence has been read and a legal foundation of each charge both in statute and in the Constitution has been established. We have done more than that in our documents. We have reproduced copies of the extracts of the material statutes just for your evaluation and convenience. However, I want us to evaluate this ruling by the Court of Appeal that has been alluded to one time too many. It is found in the documents of the Governor Volume III. There is a very important finding that I wish the Senate considers in exercising your mandate in this matter. That is on page 111. Governor’s documents, Volume III on page 9 of the judgment of the Court Appeal in Civil Appeal No.21 of 2014. The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposes only. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor, Senate."}