{"id":787634,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/787634/?format=json","text_counter":279,"type":"speech","speaker_name":"Sen. Sakaja","speaker_title":"","speaker":{"id":13131,"legal_name":"Johnson Arthur Sakaja","slug":"johnson-arthur-sakaja"},"content":"No, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. I was just trying to persuade you about these prefixes that are not too much of a superlative nature. However, on this particular statement, I want to correct the Chairperson. Is she in order to try and bring up the matter of sub judice, yet the answer to the question is what she has already said; that the matter is in court? That, in itself, is the answer to the question of what is going to be done to the musicians who did the derogatory song against the Kamba community. In her response, by saying this matter has been investigated and the two young musicians are in court itself suffices to be the answer. What other answer is she looking for after the court case? The reason I am saying this is because we do not want to keep repeating the same statements on and on, because there are other important statements being asked. If the matter is before court, it is a matter of sub judice. However, that action itself of the police arresting the musicians, charging them and taking them before a court of law is the answer in itself."}