{"id":987486,"url":"http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/987486/?format=json","text_counter":740,"type":"speech","speaker_name":"Rarieda, ODM","speaker_title":"Hon. (Dr.) Otiende Amollo","speaker":{"id":13465,"legal_name":"Paul Otiende Amollo","slug":"paul-otiende-amollo"},"content":" On a point of order, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman. I think the Clerks need to assist you so that we can save time. I am not opposing but I need to understand it better. The idea of moving the period from 45 days to 60 days should be instructed by something that is justified for these kinds of quasi-judicial matters. In fact, the ordinary period is usually 14 days. So, by giving 45 days I would assume that is reasonable. When you extend it to 60 days there ought to be a better justification than somebody wanting 15 more days. You must remember that this is a dispute which is denying Government of either revenue it is entitled to or putting somebody at risk."}