Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 564774,
    "url": "http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/564774/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 793,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Oyugi",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 444,
        "legal_name": "Augostinho Neto Oyugi",
        "slug": "augostinho-neto-oyugi"
    },
    "content": "I do not want to debate. Thank you very much, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. I agree with you in terms of all those things you have said. I would like you to listen to the import of what I am saying. I am not looking at any powers or conditions. What you are trying to do in Clause 83 (1), if you look at it properly, is that you are giving the Regulatory Board the authority, on its own volition, to decide what documents are required. Therefore, you are giving it discretionary power. What you have said is true. Clause 84 of this Bill enumerates the conditions for giving out a license, which is proper and good. The only thing I request you to do is to remove the second line which reads “an application and such supporting documents as the Board may require.” This is because the phrase “the documents the board may require” is already under Clause 84. I do not know if I am making sense. It has nothing to do with who has what power. The documents that are required are shown in Clause 84 so that no one can make up an extra document, whatever it may be, because that is already enumerated. I will only look at the law under Clause 84, which says that I need to have certain documents, which I have already submitted. I do not know if I am making sense."
}