Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 572880,
    "url": "http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/572880/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 56,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Hon. Members, an issue arising consequential to the foregoing finding is the question of who determines whether or not an alternative amendment proposed by a committee or a Member has the effect of fully accommodating the President’s reservations. The Kenyan Constitution is silent on this issue. In South Africa’s legislative practice, this power is vested in the House in the first instance, in the presidency in the second instance and finally in the courts in the ultimate instance. It is also noteworthy that in South Africa, unlike in our case, the power of the President to express reservations to a Bill passed by Parliament is restricted only to the constitutionality of the Bill. The relevant provisions of the South African Constitution are in Article 79, which provides as follows, and I quote:"
}