Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 694996,
    "url": "http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/694996/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 1127,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "neither does the governor inform the county assembly that he has appointed advocates to act on his behalf. Was this an omission or was it deliberate? The second question is on the lease for this building; Karson House. The lease document states clearly that any renovations will be done with the consent of the landlord. Two, the valuer, before the Nyeri County Government entered into that lease, confirmed that, in fact, there had been recent renovations. Three, when the County Government entered into this lease, it is not specified that there was any renovations that were required. Is this an omission or it was deliberate? Four, what is the understanding of the County Assembly in terms of Article 226(2) in terms of the report by the County Executive? Lastly, you pointed that to the Court of Appeal ruling. I noticed that the Court of Appeal did not quote Section 102 of the PFM Act which talks about collective responsibility in terms of procurement. We also know of the principle of per in curiam, where a ruling does not comply with a law. Could you make a comment on that?"
}