GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/717053/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 717053,
"url": "http://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/717053/?format=api",
"text_counter": 885,
"type": "other",
"speaker_name": "",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "voted on as a block. There are Members who have expressed their opinions on one clause in one way and on another in another way; for example, the distinguished Senator for Garissa who singled out one on boundaries and said he saw the point and he would vote differently. So, when you band it with every other clause, then you are making it difficult for Members to make informed choices. I suggest that we vote on each clause on its own and because of the time taken, it will also be desirable for the Chair, in the shortest time possible to tell, what that amendment was for so that people vote from an informed position. Otherwise, if you will just say, vote for all these, then we are not doing justice to ourselves."
}