Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1005873,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1005873/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 112,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Nakuru Town East, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. David Gikaria",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2489,
        "legal_name": "David Gikaria",
        "slug": "david-gikaria"
    },
    "content": "Secondly, Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, and on this one, again, I would want you to make a ruling. In the 11th Parliament when we were vetting Cabinet Secretaries, assuming our CS is vetted today, would he or she still be vetted in the next Parliament? I think a decision was reached that we no longer vet CSs who are being re-appointed. So, say, in the next Parliament, they do not necessarily go through vetting. That is the other thing that I want you to make a ruling on. When an approval by the Budget and Appropriations Committee and the House has been done on a matter, does it have to come back for approval again? This payment was meant for the 2018/2019 Financial Year, which was approved towards the weird days, just like today. It was towards the very last minute. It was approved by the Budget and Appropriations Committee and the House, but the payment came in the subsequent financial year. When it comes in the subsequent financial year, then, again, it is subjected to approval. I think that is a matter that you need to make a ruling on because we had already got an approval for the same where we agreed that it should be paid. It was paid on 1st August 2019. All the same, that notwithstanding..."
}