Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1010429,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1010429/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 391,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mogotio, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Daniel Tuitoek",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13434,
        "legal_name": "Daniel Kamuren Tuitoek",
        "slug": "daniel-kamuren-tuitoek"
    },
    "content": " Thank you, Hon. Speaker, for giving me this opportunity. I was listening to the contributions. One which is interesting is that when a Motion comes here, I thought the Members are supposed to get more time to ventilate on the Report, give their ideas, maybe, bring amendments that are approved by the Speaker and decide on those amendments. But since the amendments have been dropped, I would like to say that there is no harm in moving to debate this Motion. We can then decide among ourselves whether the Report is credible or not. I think in as far as the recommendation to the EACC and others agencies are concerned, it is always normal for them to carry out further investigations because we do not have the capacity to investigate those particular aspects of wrongdoing. It is right, as you have said that we cannot deliberate in vain over something we cannot control. In this particular case, the Chair has agreed that they can recommend to the EACC to investigate. As to whether the EACC can submit their report to the House, that is their prerogative. They can as well send it to the DPP for action or they can terminate the investigations if they feel there may be no adequate information on the allegations. I really do not want to contribute much on this. Therefore, I beg to support."
}