GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1013077/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1013077,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1013077/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 23,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Speaker",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "with the law. You must determine which is the right agency to which you can recommend further action. I have read yours and when you say: “The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) and the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) investigates”, you are actually almost causing the thing to be taken to some cupboard somewhere. This is because, who is going to investigate? When one will go, the other will say they are also investigating it and then there will be a paralysis. Therefore, it is good that when it comes to debate, you can decide because you know what it is that you found. Look at the EACC Act, see their mandate and establish what things they are mandated to investigate. This is so that if you think that it is them who should investigate, leave the other one so that you can, as a House, which has the mandate to oversee State organs ask: “We told you to investigate, what have you done?” It also helps the Committee on Implementation to make a follow up. However, when they are two, each will say that they left it to the other one to investigate and eventually nothing will be done. This is just advice, but you know what it is that you found out. Let us have the Majority Whip."
}