GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1016318/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1016318,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1016318/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 345,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Orengo",
    "speaker_title": "The Senate Minority Leader",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 129,
        "legal_name": "Aggrey James Orengo",
        "slug": "james-orengo"
    },
    "content": " Mr. Speaker, Sir, you know such behaviour, especially from a Whip--- He should be thrown out. The point I am making is very important. Unfortunately, Sen. Kang’ata does not understand the point because a Motion, whether it is addressed to the Clerk or the Speaker, is still a Motion. The fact of the matter is that it is a Motion so recognized. The administrative process is also clear, if it is received by the Clerk, then it is sent to the Speaker. If the Clerk sits on it, then it will be dereliction of duty. What I am simply asking is that, that understanding is required, particularly in circumstances where sometimes in the day you may get a revised Order Paper or a Supplementary Order Paper and, probably, that Motion was not in the initial Order Paper. In those circumstances, what does one do? It is a very complicated question. It is not as simple as it looks, hon. Kang’ata. It is a very complicat Me r d . pr S o pec aess ke . r, Sir, you need not give that ruling now because I think it is an important point, but I hope that it will be covered in the ruling."
}