GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1016354/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1016354,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1016354/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 381,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Olekina",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 407,
        "legal_name": "Ledama Olekina",
        "slug": "ledama-olekina"
    },
    "content": "Mr. Speaker, Sir, the point of order is this. I just want to be sure that the ruling that you are going to give is not in anticipatory of what the amendments will be. When I read this, it says “amendment to be relevant to the Motion.” My interpretation, with all due respect, is that you have already seen the amendments that have been brought and because you said you would give a ruling in future, you have already decided that they are not relevant. I was seeking your indulgence in looking at Standing Order No.63 (2) which says- “Despite paragraph (1), the Speaker may, in exceptional circumstances, allow a Senator to move an amendment to a Motion before the Senate at any time during consideration of that Motion.” Mr. Speaker, Sir, I am getting confused because we are talking about a ruling being given in future. Is this ruling going to be in anticipatory of an amendment which we do not know? With all respect, just allow us to know what the ruling is going to be."
}