Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1036399,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1036399/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 1451,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Bureti, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Japheth Mutai",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13310,
        "legal_name": "Japheth Kiplangat Mutai",
        "slug": "japheth-kiplangat-mutai"
    },
    "content": " Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, just a quick one. On this issue, I wish to raise the fact that the Section 30 that we deleted was saying that the board shall arbitrate disputes. I am of the opinion that we should have a separate clause to allow the parties go for arbitration themselves. They ought to go for arbitration if there is a dispute such as between the licensee and the board. It is not only just about the person and the licensee. There should be a provision that whenever there is a dispute - before anything can go to court - where they are not satisfied with the decision, they should go for arbitration."
}