GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1052777/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1052777,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1052777/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 326,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Homa Bay Town, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Peter Kaluma",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 1565,
        "legal_name": "George Peter Opondo Kaluma",
        "slug": "george-peter-opondo-kaluma"
    },
    "content": "Clause 22(2) of the Bill gives the Cabinet Secretary discretion to keep extending the period for the person’s stay in the country indefinitely within three months. So, they are not mutually consonant. I want to request Hon. Millie to look at what it deals with. In Clause 22(c), we are saying that when your appeal is not successful, you apply to be admitted to another country within 60 days. We still safeguard the person in sub-clause (2) by saying that at the discretion of the Cabinet Secretary, the person can continue to have extension to stay around. I, therefore, do not see the rational of saying 90 days."
}