GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1062756/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 1062756,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1062756/?format=api",
"text_counter": 406,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Rarieda, ODM",
"speaker_title": "Hon. (Dr.) Otiende Amollo",
"speaker": {
"id": 13465,
"legal_name": "Paul Otiende Amollo",
"slug": "paul-otiende-amollo"
},
"content": "instructions were given. However, having explained that it was a suggestion, I agree with you. The statement by the President actually says: “With the concurrence of parliamentary leadership”. So, it was not as bad as it may sound except that even that statement is still not correct. It is not the parliamentary leadership that determines the Calendar of this Parliament. It is the parliamentarians themselves. So, I think that is very important. However, what disturbs me - and the Leader of the Majority Party might hear this when he eventually sits down - is that in moving the Motion, he says that committees of Parliament will continue sitting, but the original suggestion by the President says: “The ordinary sessions of the august House, including those of their committees”. That was the suggestion. That is the point I was coming to. However, the Motion itself does not segregate between the full sitting and the committees. I have read the Motion and perhaps I will benefit when the leader responds. I have not seen where in the Motion says: “However, committees will continue.” We must be careful about the words used in the contents of Motions."
}