Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1064052,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1064052/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 162,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Sakaja",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13131,
        "legal_name": "Johnson Arthur Sakaja",
        "slug": "johnson-arthur-sakaja"
    },
    "content": "However, my contention was that the Second Schedule that we are trying to amend does not, in any way, change the basic structure of a Constitution. Secondly, in terms of the reasons, Section 27(3) and (4) of the Sixth Schedule of our current Constitution, gives us a precedent and it was doing the same thing. It provided protection of existing constituencies under Article 89(4). Which means even when IEBC was going to do delimitation, there were constituencies they were not going to touch. That means that the provisions of Clause 74 read together with the Second Schedule is not a new idea. It has happened before. If it was constitutional then, it should be constitutional now as well. It cannot be that it was"
}