GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1085608/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 1085608,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1085608/?format=api",
"text_counter": 17,
"type": "other",
"speaker_name": "",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "Mr. Wilson Amge Arap Langat. However, the sons of Mr. Kapteberewo invaded the plot and proceeded to settle there. That, in 1990, the High Court issued a judgment on Nakuru Case No. 164 that Mr. Wilson Amge Arap Langat was the rightful owner of the plot. After the said judgment, the sons of Mr. Kapteberewo Kaibos filed a case to challenge the judgment of the High Court. The case was heard and orders were given for the dismissal of the case filed by Mr. Wilson Amge Arap Langat and cancellation and removal of his name as the owner of the Plot No. Baringo/Perkerra101/178. That, Mr. Wilson Amge Arap Langat filed an appeal against the aforementioned judgment following which the case was heard and the court upheld that Mr. Kapteberewo Kaibos was the owner of the plot. Not satisfied with the outcome, Mr. Wilson Amge Arap Langat filed a case against the settlement fund trustee. The case was heard and determined that the settlement fund trustee was to compensate Mr. Wilson Amge Arap Langat with another piece of land or repay him the money equivalent to the piece of land, Plot No. Baringo/Perkerra101/178. That, the director of land adjudications and settlement of Nairobi stated that the judicial process had failed to resolve the dispute regarding Plot No. Baringo/Perkerra101/178 and, therefore, the dispute be resolved by the settlement fund trustee. An official search dated 19th March, 2013, confirmed that Plot No. Baringo/Perkerra101/178 was under the settlement fund trustee. That, on 30th January, 2018, Mr. Wilson Amge Arap Langat moved to court again and filed a case on the Plot No. Baringo/Perkerra101/178 and the case was heard. The court determined that there was no merit in the application and the case was dismissed; and That, there appears to be a big problem in the court concerning the case of Plot No. Baringo/Pekerra101/178. That, the Petitioner has made the best efforts to have this matter addressed by the relevant authorities all of which have failed to give a satisfactory response; The petitioner therefore prays that the Senate investigates this matter with a view to ensuring that the dispute on Plot No. Baringo/Perkerra101/178 is resolved amicably and the justice prevails for Mr. Wilson Amge Arap Langat. Hon. Senators, pursuant to Standing Order No. 231, I shall now allow comments, observations or clarifications in relation to the petition for not more than 30 minutes."
}