GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1108711/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1108711,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1108711/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 238,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Endebess, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. (Dr.) Robert Pukose",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 1458,
        "legal_name": "Robert Pukose",
        "slug": "robert-pukose"
    },
    "content": " Thank you, Hon. Speaker. Having listened very keenly to Hon. Duale, one of the key issues which he raised is that of public participation. If medical professionals, nurses, doctors and pharmacists were not accorded an opportunity to appear before the departmental committee to give their views, then it means public participation was not done. How do we debate something that did not have full public participation? Looking at the ruling by both the High Court and the Court of Appeal in the BBI case, public participation is not just to be seen to be done, but must have been done properly. Listening to what the Leader of the Majority Party said about the Mwongozo Code, what we have been borrowing is good governance. It is not just a question of the numbers and everything. What this Bill intends to do is to bring bad governance into professional bodies. When you say you want to open up professional bodies to persons from other professions, what do you mean? People form professional bodies to cater for their own interests. If we form a professional body for doctors and there is a professional body for lawyers, at what stage do we need somebody else to come and participate? Why should you have someone imposed on you and then you are The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor."
}