Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1119665,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1119665/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 342,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "If the reasons for that transfer was incompetence of the then governor, it cannot be passed now to the next governor who definitely will be a competent governor and capable of overseeing the delivery of those services. I urge the House to look at that provision quite carefully. I think it is very important to avoid some mischief where entities like NMS are established and they stay forever. They then serve to take away certain constitutional provisions through the backdoor. Assuming that a deed of transfer lapses, what happens to the assets and liabilities that have accrued during that period where functions have been transferred? For example, you have NMS putting up lots of infrastructure in the City, especially hospitals, roads and water projects. However, there could also be liabilities that NMS is accruing during that time. Liabilities could be payments for salaries, statutory contributions and such like things."
}