Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1119690,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1119690/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 367,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "This Bill should define or set prerequisites for renewal of the transfer of functions. They should be clear on what should be done when the agreement lapses. I hope we can amend some of these proposals to include the approval by Parliament after it has extensively gone through the report of the success, looked at the milestones of the functions which were transferred from the county government to the national Government. This is the only way we can be sure that when transferring a function, you are not transferring authority, but a function for it to be carried out better than you would. I am sure the framers of the Constitution what they had in mind when they came up with Article 187 was that, if by any chance, a governor was unable to build roads because of lack of expertise, he transfer the function to the national Government because he believed they could do better than him. It was not because there was pressure from the Executive to take that function. One day, we will be accountable and judged by history if we do not correct it now. I thank Sen. M. Kajwang‟ and the Standing Committee on Devolution and Intergovernmental Relations for trying to put some sense and sanity into this issue of transfer of function. I beg to second."
}