Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1126562,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1126562/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 41,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "In their judgment, the distinguished judges held as follows, in paragraph 98: “Therefore, it was an error by the High Court to find that it is a condition precedent that any Bill published by either House be subjected to the concurrence process”. Hon. Members, the finding of the Court of Appeal on this matter is that only Bills concerning county governments as espoused in Article 110(1) of the Constitution would be subject to the concurrence process. The Court rightly held that Article 110(3) can only be interpreted in the context of the law making roles and procedures of the Senate and National Assembly as specified in Articles 109 to 116 of the Constitution. Would the Members who are at the door come in?"
}