GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1133354/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 1133354,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1133354/?format=api",
"text_counter": 466,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Seme, ODM",
"speaker_title": "Hon. (Dr.) James Nyikal",
"speaker": {
"id": 434,
"legal_name": "James Nyikal",
"slug": "james-nyikal"
},
"content": " Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I do not support this basically for the same reason. “Accuse” is too general. It should either be “under investigation” or “on trial” because those are specifics. You know what to do and when, but, in this case, who is accusing? If a Member of the Board is accused and someone goes to the Press and says: “we suspect”, is that enough reason? I think we need better terminology or just drop it all together."
}