Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1133435,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1133435/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 547,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Suba North, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. (Ms.) Odhiambo-Mabona",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 376,
        "legal_name": "Millie Grace Akoth Odhiambo Mabona",
        "slug": "millie-odhiambo-mabona"
    },
    "content": " I think the Chair is a little confused and she is confusing the House. She is talking about functionalities and the law but what she is amending makes it not just functional but also legal. The Chair is saying that the corporation secretary shall be responsible to the Director General. That therefore makes it legal. It will not just be functional; it will be legal. The corporation secretary shall not then be answerable to anybody other than the Director General. If that is your intention, that they be answerable to the Director General, that is okay. It is for order. If your intention is for them to be functionally responsible to the Director General but legally to the Board, then it is the Board you should put here and maybe say “functionally responsible”. What you are saying is different from what you are proposing. You are proposing a legal responsibility, directly to the Director General. Be clear about what you want. Personally, I will support you because you are experienced in the sector and you know what works. So, tell us what you want. What you are saying is not what is in the amendment."
}