GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1135116/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1135116,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1135116/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 94,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "of taxation and revenue-raising measures and should, therefore, not be used to introduce proposals such as those amending the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act which are not incidental to taxation or revenue raising measures. Secondly, it was claimed that the amendments to Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act proposed to limit to fundamental rights and freedoms without satisfying the criteria set out in Article 24 of the Constitution on the manner of limiting fundamental rights and freedoms in statute. In my guidance to the House on 19th September, 2019, I observed that Article 24 of the Constitution permits limitation of certain rights and freedoms by law, hence the argument that Clauses 50 and 51 of the Finance Bill, 2019 ought to be excluded from consideration by the House on account of limiting constitutional rights seemed"
}