GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1147942/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1147942,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1147942/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 255,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Suba North, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. (Ms.) Odhiambo-Mabona",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 376,
        "legal_name": "Millie Grace Akoth Odhiambo Mabona",
        "slug": "millie-odhiambo-mabona"
    },
    "content": " Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, then I am going to the offences. My proposal was to delete the word “exceeding”. I have actually been helped because we had a meeting earlier. What I am doing is to drop the word… I think this is confusing me further. Let me just go the way I was going. What I had proposed earlier in the last one because we have agreed on the first two, my original proposal was to delete the word “exceeding” after the words “fine not” and substitute with the words “of not less than”. What I am saying is that I drop that specific amendment and instead delete the word “one” and replace with “five”. So my proposal in that paragraph is delete “one” and replace with “five”. That is all. That is my further amendment. Are you following me? I can read it out. So it becomes: “Commits an office and shall, on conviction, be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or to a fine not exceeding Kshs5 million, or to both.” The reason why I am doing a further amendment - after consultations - is that it gives great latitude but still gives discretion to the magistrate or the judge."
}