Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1148124,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1148124/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 437,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Suba North, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. (Ms.) Odhiambo-Mabona",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 376,
        "legal_name": "Millie Grace Akoth Odhiambo Mabona",
        "slug": "millie-odhiambo-mabona"
    },
    "content": " Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move: THAT, Clause 155 be amended by inserting the following new sub-clause after sub-clause 6— (6A) a person who is aggrieved by a care order may appeal to the Court. I want to clarify that I gave the wrong reasons for Clause 154, even though I still support the deletion, which we have done. The reason for Clause 154 has to do with discipline of children which parents have. But if we put is as proviso, it is actually negative. But now the reason I gave for Clause 154 is actually for Clause 155, that a person who is aggrieved by a care order may appeal to court. The reasoning is different, but the proposal remains the same that we have deleted 154, and I am proposing (a) to replace with a person who is aggrieved by a care order or a new (6A), a person who is aggrieved by a care order to appeal to court. Thank you."
}