GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1150786/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1150786,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1150786/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 386,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Suba North, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. (Ms.) Odhiambo-Mabona",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 376,
        "legal_name": "Millie Grace Akoth Odhiambo Mabona",
        "slug": "millie-odhiambo-mabona"
    },
    "content": "specified….” I was just saying for it to be neat and concise, we just say “Nobody shall subject a child to psychological abuse and to child abuse.” Already, child abuse is very clearly defined. When you say child abuse, we know what it means and I am also proposing a comprehensive definition of psychological abuse which if it passes, then it is sufficient. So we do not need to go through all these long stories because they may actually even be limiting. If you look at my definition of psychological abuse, what is put here is limiting. Then if you look at child abuse even as defined in the Act, what is defined as child abuse is more comprehensive. So I would just suggest that we put “no person shall subject a child to psychological abuse or child abuse”. Simple! Then for the rest, we go to the definition of what psychological abuse or child abuse is."
}