Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1150965,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1150965/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 565,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Suba North, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. (Ms.) Odhiambo-Mabona",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 376,
        "legal_name": "Millie Grace Akoth Odhiambo Mabona",
        "slug": "millie-odhiambo-mabona"
    },
    "content": "the child is born and children whose parents consequently get married. So, I am challenging sub- clause 6 as well. I am seeking to renumber 4 to 2 so that sub-clause will read “without prejudice to the generality of sub-section 1 not 3” because I am proposing to delete 3. I hope you are following me Hon. Chairman. So, I am proposing an amendment to Clause 3(1), deletion of entire 2, deletion of entire 3 (a) and (b), then I am proposing to renumber 4 to become 2 and after doing that I am proposing the deletion of entire sub-clause 6 because what it is basically doing is provide categorised standards for children born out of wedlock, within wedlock, when parents are married, that is straightaway unconstitutional. So, I only mentioned sub-clause 1 of my proposed amendment, but there is 2 and 3. In all these things, we would look at the best interest of the child and then without generality to one, two or more, persons may exercise concurrent parental responsibility over the same child taking into account that sometimes we may have peculiar circumstances because of our culture. However, to start providing the same provisions under Section 24 of the Children Act is unconstitutional."
}