Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1150974,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1150974/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 574,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Kipipiri, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Amos Kimunya",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 174,
        "legal_name": "Amos Muhinga Kimunya",
        "slug": "amos-kimunya"
    },
    "content": " Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I basically see Hon. Millie’s amendment as simplification of the provisions which were in the Bill. What the Bill had tried to do is to cater for all kinds of situations like people in wedlock, out of wedlock and people who are unmarried and eventually get married. However, what Hon. Millie has done is collapse all that into one. So, we are basically talking about the same thing except the Bill is far much more detailed and providing for the different situations. If that amounts to an unconstitutional provision, then either way, I think we lose nothing by going through the amendment proposed by Hon. Millie. Unless advised otherwise for simplicity, Hon. Millie’s amendment is less confusing than what is in the Bill and basically we are talking about the same thing that the true parents will have equal responsibilities regardless of the circumstances. So then we do not need to define all those circumstances because the end result is equal responsibilities. I actually prefer the simplified version as proposed by Hon. Millie. I support the amendment."
}