Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1175141,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1175141/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 120,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "functions reserved for county governments, the Bill is likely to concern county governments within the meaning of Article 110(1)(a) of the Constitution; THAT, the public participation exercise conducted by the Departmental Committee on Education and Research was not sufficient as it did not involve its primary stakeholders and persons directly affected by the proposed legislation by default. The Committee ought to have invited, heard and considered the views of the Vice-Chancellors of, at least, a reasonable fraction of all the 52 public and private chartered universities, the 12 institutions with letters of interim authority, the Commission cod University Education and the Universities Fund Board, at the very least; THAT, based on the submissions by the Members in the House and the plethora of amendments contained in the Order Paper for yesterday and today afternoon, the harmonisation of the amendments proposed to the Bill by the Committee did not meet the dictates of Standing Order No.131; and, THAT, the Universities (Amendment) Bill, 2021 be and is hereby, ordered to be re- published in order to take into account the concerns raised by Members and align it with the expectations of Articles 10, 43(1)(f), 201 and 229(5) of the Constitution. The House is accordingly guided. I thank you, Hon. Members."
}