Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1199042,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1199042/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 268,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Yatta, WDM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Robert Ngui",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "This is a Motion I fully support. It is going to shoulder the burden that parents are going through to be able to raise or pay for food in schools for their kids. It is also going to boost retention in schools. Therefore, this is a Motion I fully support and I hope that we can entrench the school feeding programme in the NG-CDF so that, at least, we can have it budgeted and money allocated to provide food to school-going children. With those few remarks, I did not have a chance to contribute to the Presidential debate. However, something caught my eye. When you talk about the hustlers’ fund, my question is: Are we trying to baptise Uwezo Fund and call it hustlers’ fund? Uwezo Fund tends to serve the same function as what the hustlers’ fund is intended to do. What was wrong with Uwezo Fund which motivated the Head of State to bring the hustlers’ fund? This is something we need to look into so that we can take lessons learnt from Uwezo Fund to inform the hustlers’ fund. Otherwise, it will be a duplication of efforts by creating another fund which will serve the same purpose and function as the Uwezo Fund."
}