GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1217808/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 1217808,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1217808/?format=api",
"text_counter": 348,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Emurua Dikirr, UDA",
"speaker_title": "Hon. Johana Kipyegon",
"speaker": null,
"content": "the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeal. Whenever they pass any judgement, most of their judgements are deemed precedents and they are used in courts as law. The ruling by the Supreme Court, whichever way it was, has gone against Article 11 of the Constitution. Therefore, it means that judgement by the Supreme Court is null and void because it is against the Constitution. There is nothing else we can say about it. We will still consider in this House that that law never existed; that judgement was never made. We will just consider it as if there was nothing done. If the Supreme Court judges were six or seven, they sat in vain. Whatever decision they made in that judgement was in vain. Article 11 is very clear that no same-sex marriage is allowed in this country. No same-sex relationship is allowed in this country. No same-sex penetration is allowed in this country. When these courts declare or presume to be making a declaration that they are making a judgement or giving a ruling to allow these people to have a relationship, look at one another, and have some association, it is going contrary to the Constitution."
}