Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1217843,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1217843/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 383,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Seme, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. (Dr) James Nyikal",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": " Thank you, Hon. Temporary Speaker for giving me this opportunity. The decision in court is the actual issue. It is not even about discrimination against these Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ) people forming an organisation. When you form a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO), it means that you want to propagate it. If you do it quietly in your home, who has said… There is no discrimination about it. Whichever way you look at it, be it biologically, this is not something that we should propagate. People who find themselves there, and accept it, can do it in the privacy of their homes, and that is where it ends. In reality, in the universe earth, all physical living and non-living things have their own properties and forces that determine their existence and powers that regulates them. Interference by human beings to change that leads to destruction and, therefore, if you are a Christian, all physical forces and factors of nature will make you say it is because of God. All religions accept a greater super-being and attribute such forces to it. If you are an atheist, you will say nature. We all know that if we disobey nature, we will be extinct. What is the purpose of mating? We can call it sex, because we add feelings to it, but it is basically mating. It is for procreation. There is no other purpose for it. So, if you promote mating that does not lead to procreation, in the end, it will be destructive. I do not see why we should pursue that. That ruling therefore, gave a provision of propagating it. You cannot register an organisation for the sake of it. The object of any group is to promote what they do, and that is where they are. These laws of nature and of God, and what human beings will incorporate in our morals, cultures and religions, should also be in our laws. That is what we do. If you look at our cultures, religion and laws, they reject this. The Constitution is clear about married man and woman. Culture is accepted in our Constitution and in our laws where unnatural sex is illegal. What then is the argument? Probably, I cannot understand because I am not a lawyer. The argument is that of discrimination when people want to propagate something which is not The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor."
}