GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/122415/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 122415,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/122415/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 261,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. Deputy Speaker",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Order! Order, hon. Members! The Chair is conscious of the facts and the circumstances leading to the point of order being raised. It all has something to do with who is the suspect and who is not a suspect in the Post-Election Violence (PEV) and other issues, including the conformity to the Public Officer Ethics Act, whereas Standing Order 82(1) states as follows:- “A Member shall be responsible for the accuracy of any facts which the Member alleges to be true and may be required to substantiate any such facts instantly.” In the event he is not able, he has time to do it later. We also have another provision of the Standing Orders here, which essentially prohibits discussing the conduct of sitting Members of Parliament in the House without going through an elaborate process of putting up a substantive Motion and, at the same time giving a notice. In the event that happens, the Member also has a right to defend himself or herself on the Floor of the House. That is the logic and rationale behind this. The Chair is going to give direction on this matter on Tuesday afternoon next week. Next Order!"
}