GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/123802/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 123802,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/123802/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 382,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to comment on the issue of the cut-off age. As we decide who is going to be paid, it is important we ask ourselves: “What will be the cut-off age?” It will be my submission that when the Bill is actually being drafted, they consider that it is wrong to pay a woman the same as a man. This is because under our rural lifestyles, our women, because of the stresses of giving birth, going to the stream to look for water and firewood, going to the farm to dig, bear the greater damage of aging. For that reason, I am suggesting that as we start paying off people, we divide these people into two groups; people who have evidence that in their lifetime they had gainful employment and those who had no employment whatsoever. For the people who were in gainful employment, I propose that men start earning from this fund from the age of 70, over and above whatever retirement benefits they might be having. On the other hand, the women should start earning from this fund at the age of 65, over and above whatever pension they were earning. As for those who are totally unemployed, I would propose that men earn start benefitting from the age of 65 and women from the age of 60."
}