Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 125259,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/125259/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 630,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "of law court, by-law or other instrument made under or by virtue of any ordinance, and having legislative effect. It is subject to the approval of the counsel which may be given. A Gazette Notice gives legal effect to the appointment and, therefore, it falls within the ordinary meaning of subsidiary legislation. We, as Parliament, one good thing we did--- I mentioned it yesterday when we were celebrating the first International Day of Democracy; one of the key highlights I thought our Parliament had made was to amend our Standing Orders, so as to allow the public to see us debating, enlarge the rules, so that we are able to check on the Executive. Surely, how can we pass these rules and then say that they are too much? Why can we not move an amendment to the rules? We are playing by the rules when we say that this appointment was not carried out within the law. I want to refer to Section 23---"
}