GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1274391/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1274391,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1274391/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 205,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Kilgoris, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon Julius Sunkuli",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "I admit that there were some cases in which this subsidy was not conducted well because it was not easy to identify the market. Which unga was subsidised and which one was not? However, subsidised unga was sold. The problem now is that we have a new Government. It is a successor Government. In fact, a huge component of this Government was the former Government. We have an issue at hand: should the new Government abrogate the contracts that were made by the other Government just because they were not well implemented? The Report has pointed out the errors of that day, but it also states that obligations must be met. As a House, we must factor in the Budget the payment of these subsidies. We really have no choice. The Departmental Committee on Agriculture and Livestock, in its wisdom, has seen it that we have no choice. Let the Government pay the subsidies because it undertook to pay. In future, they should do what they did originally. They should state the price of unga prior and make the subsidised unga identifiable in the market. Otherwise, this Report is good. I support."
}