Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 127465,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/127465/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 344,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. Speaker",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Hon. Members, you will recall that on Thursday, 3rd September, 2009, I delivered a Communication from the Chair concerning an issue raised by Mr. Isack Ruto, requesting that this House does not proceed to deliberate on a Motion for the adoption of the Report of the Government Taskforce on the Conservation of the Mau Forest Complex. You will recall that in that ruling, I made it clear that no evidence had been adduced to show that High Court Miscellaneous Civil Case No.313 of 2005 was active within the meaning of Standing Order No.80(3) so as to make the matter sub judice . Following that ruling, the Hon. Isack Ruto claimed that he had in his possession, evidence showing that the case was active and undertook to furnish the Chair with such evidence. Hon. Ruto thereafter, presented further documents to the Chair. Hon. Members, the documents presented to the Chair relate to High Court Civil Case No.664 of 2005, an altogether different case from the original judicial review application previously presented to the Chair, and which was the subject of Hon. Ruto’s claim that the Mau Forest Complex matter was sub judice . This is a civil case in which some seven individuals sued the County Council of Narok, seeking, among other orders, a declaration that they are entitled to the exclusive and unimpeded right of possession and occupation of certain properties, and further"
}