Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 127467,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/127467/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 346,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "seeking orders restraining the County Council of Narok by itself or by its agents from entering, remaining on or continuing in occupation, demolishing and burning the plaintiffs’ property or in any manner whatsoever, interfering with the plaintiffs’ quiet and peaceful enjoyment of their property. In this new case, orders were obtained, restraining the County Council of Narok as aforesaid. Hon. Members, it is important to observe that in the new documents presented to the Chair, none of the parties in the judicial review application are parties to that suit, nor is the subject matter the same. More importantly, as I explained above, the suit is a private matter between the seven plaintiffs and the County Council of Narok. The orders obtained are orders binding only upon the parties to the suit and their agents and or servants. The task that Hon. Isack Ruto undertook to discharge was to present evidence to the Chair that High Court Miscellaneous Civil Case No.313 of 2005 was active. This task cannot be said to have been discharged by presenting papers relating to a completely different and unrelated suit between different parties and orders not binding on parties other than those in that suit. Hon. Members, in the light of the foregoing, I rule that no evidence, or further evidence, has been provided that debate on the Motion for Adoption of the Report of the Government Taskforce on the Conservation of the Mau Forest Complex is sub judice . The ruling I previously made on the matter, therefore, stands. Thank you. Next Order!"
}