Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 1280480,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/1280480/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 520,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Suba North, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Millie Odhiambo-Mabona",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": " Thank you, Hon. Temporary Chairman. First of all, let me thank the Chairperson for agreeing to adopt the issue on warrants. My concern is in 17D(c) on information relating to that person’s financial, family or private affairs, where required, may be revealed. My only concern is to whom this information will be revealed. For example, I have just seen a news flash that Hon. Oparanya has been arrested by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) and he has been found with 13 or 14 title deeds. What is wrong with owning title deeds? My issue is, even if I am being investigated, this information should only be revealed to the investigating body. These proposed amendments are properly worded. However, why are we flashing private property to the public when we do not know what these investigations relate to? Can we adopt an amendment relating to a person’s financial, family or private affairs, that where this information may be required, it can only be revealed to the relevant authorities? Hon. Temporary Chairman, when you leave it that way it means we reveal it to anyone and everyone. But for what purposes? We are making people vulnerable because if my property The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor."
}